Views
Decoding SRD Corporate Action Notices: What You Need To Know
The Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II) introduced significant changes to how information flows between issuers, intermediaries, and shareholders across Europe.
One of the most operationally important elements of the regulation is the SRD corporate action notice, the mechanism through which issuers communicate key events, shareholder rights, and voting information.
While SRD II aims to improve transparency and shareholder engagement, the practical implementation of corporate action notices continues to expose inefficiencies across the custody chain.
This feature explains: what an SRD corporate action notice is, how SRD II changed the requirements, who is impacted, and where challenges still exist in practice.
What is an SRD corporate action notice?
An SRD corporate action notice is a formal communication issued by a listed company to inform its shareholders about significant corporate events that require their attention or action. Under the Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II), these notices must be transmitted through the custody chain in a standardised, machine-readable format, within strict intraday deadlines.
These include:
• general meeting announcements
• voting agendas and resolutions
• dividend payments
• mergers, acquisitions, and restructurings
Under SRD II, these notices must be:
• timely
• accurate
• standardised
• and transmitted efficiently through intermediaries
The objective is to ensure that investors, particularly in cross-border scenarios, receive the information they need to exercise their rights without delay or distortion.
Under SRD II, the framework for delivering that information has become considerably more demanding, and the operational stakes of getting it wrong have risen accordingly.
How SRD II aims to change corporate action communication
SRD II builds on the original 2007 directive by introducing stricter requirements around how corporate action information is created, transmitted, and confirmed.
But first, let’s quickly talk about the regulation itself.
What is SRD II? A brief definition
The Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II) is an EU Directive 2017/828, which came into force on 3 September 2020. It amends the original Shareholder Rights Directive from 2007 and establishes binding requirements across five areas:
• shareholder identification
• the facilitation of shareholder rights
• the transmission of information through intermediaries
• transparency of proxy advisors
• director remuneration
SRD II brought into effect several changes that aim to impact how corporate action notices flow across the custody chain.
Enhanced transparency and timeliness
One of the most significant changes is the emphasis on transparency and timeliness. SRD II requires issuers to provide detailed and timely information on corporate actions, ensuring shareholders receive notices well before any deadlines.
This means real-time or same-day transmission from issuer to intermediary.
The challenge:
In practice, these processes are hindered by legacy solutions powered by manual batch–driven processing. A report by ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) noted that investors still receive information around general meetings or corporate actions too late for it to be actionable.
Additionally, the involvement of multiple parties across the custody chain can lead to delays and the transmission of inaccurate or misinterpreted information.
Solutions like Proxymity ensure that golden source information is transmitted directly from the issuer to the investors in real-time, maintaining accuracy, efficiency and transparency across the custody chain.
Improved shareholder identification
SRD II gave issuers the right to identify their shareholders at any point during the year, a significant change from the opaque model that preceded it. Intermediaries must maintain and share accurate shareholder records upon request, in machine-readable format and within strict response deadlines.
The directive sets a minimum identification threshold of 0.5% shareholding, though many EU member states permit issuers to request identification of any holder with at least one share. Shareholder data may be retained for up to 12 months following cessation of the holding.
Volume under this regime has grown materially since implementation. According to the ECB, 20,303 shareholder disclosure requests were processed across EU markets during the period from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025, up from 19,602 the prior year and 15,998 in 2022/23.
The challenge:
As the ECB’s compliance monitoring has repeatedly highlighted, there is no universal definition of “shareholder” across EU member states, requiring intermediaries to determine the correct procedure based on the law of each issuer’s country of registration. This adds complexity for cross-border custodians servicing issuers across multiple jurisdictions.
Standardised formats & machine-readable processing
SRD II mandated the use of standardised, structured data formats for all corporate action notices and disclosure responses. The de facto standard is ISO 20022 XML messaging via the SWIFT network, replacing the older ISO 15022 format.
This standardisation reduces the risk of misinterpretation, enables automated processing, and allows for faster, more reliable transmission across the chain.
The challenge:
According to the ECB’s 2025 Corporate Events Compliance Report, paper-based disclosure requests continue to be received in several EU markets, which is directly inconsistent with the SRD II requirement for machine-readable, electronic processing. Manual, batch-driven workflows compound this problem by introducing delays and creating the risk of inaccurate or misinterpreted information at each handoff in the chain.
Migration from ISO 15022 to ISO 20022 also remains a significant operational challenge for many intermediaries, impacting the shareholder disclosure landscape.
Vote confirmation obligations
SRD II requires intermediaries to confirm that votes have been received and recorded.
Issuers are entitled to receive confirmation that their shareholder meeting resolutions have been properly transmitted and tallied. This requirement introduces significant operational demand across the custody chain, particularly for large funds with broad institutional investor bases.
The challenge:
The Better Finance 2025 review of SRD II highlights that retail investors across the EU still routinely face procedural complexity, missing AGM information, and data losses along the intermediary chain, particularly in cross-border situations.
How are parties impacted by the SRD II directive?
The changes introduced by SRD II impact all the principal groups in the custody chain, including issuers, intermediaries, and shareholders.
Issuers
Issuers must ensure all corporate action notices, vote confirmation requests and disclosure communications are accurate, timely, and compliant with standardised formats.
In return, they gain the right to identify their investor base at any point during the year.
Proxymity Shareholder Insights provides issuers and their agents with a real-time view of their beneficial owner base, with initial reports available within minutes of a request being distributed. This allows issuers to benefit from SRD II and build a more informed, year-round engagement strategy with their investors.
Intermediaries
Custodians, brokers, and other intermediaries bear the heaviest operational burden under SRD II. They are required to:
• Maintain and share accurate shareholder records with issuers on request
• Respond to disclosure requests within the prescribed intraday deadlines
• Transmit all corporate action notices and shareholder communications in standardised, machine-readable formats without delay
• Issue vote confirmations to shareholders following general meetings
• Ensure shareholders can exercise their participation and voting rights
• Delete shareholder data within 12 months of the holder ceasing to hold a position
• Publicly disclose any charges for SRD II-related services, on a non-discriminatory and proportionate basis
Proxymity Shareholder Disclosure supports intermediaries by processing disclosure requests in multiple messaging formats, removing the requirement for full ISO 20022 migration as a precondition for SRD II compliance.
Shareholders
Shareholders are the intended beneficiaries of SRD II. The directive exists to ensure they receive the information they need to exercise their rights, including the right to attend and vote at general meetings, engage with management on remuneration, and make informed decisions on corporate actions.
How to stay ahead of SRD II compliance
Complying and staying on top of SRD II or any other regulations requires a comprehensive approach that involves updating processes, systems, and communication strategies. Here are some key tips that companies can take to ensure they are ready for any new regulations.
Audit your current corporate action notice process
Map every step between the issuer’s golden-source announcement and the investor’s confirmed receipt. Identify where manual handoffs occur, where data can be corrupted or delayed, and how your current system handles the intraday deadline requirements.
A crucial aspect of the audit is the level of technology leveraged and working out an effective digital transformation plan to enable better processing of corporate action notices under SRD II.
A survey by Deloitte highlighted that over 40% of wealth management firms saw lower costs and nearly a third saw better shareholder value and risk management through effective digital transformations.
Assess your messaging format capability
ISO 20022 is the mandated standard. If your systems still operate on ISO 15022 or rely on free-text formats, the gap between your current capability and what SRD II requires is material.
Full migration to ISO 20022 can be expensive, resource-intensive and take away from the business’s core service to clients. As Proxymity’s CEO, Dean Little, recommends, a “buy now, build later” approach can enable a faster and more cost-effective alternative to a system overhaul, provided you integrate with the right provider.
Train your staff to under and comply with the requirements
Ensuring that your staff are well-trained and knowledgeable about SRD II and other relevant regulations is essential for successful compliance. Providing training sessions and resources to educate your employees on new requirements and best practices for managing corporate action notices is critical. Additionally, it is important for them to know the penalties involved for non-compliance.
For instance, as per SRD II, member states can implement their own fines as the regulation only states that it needs to be “sufficiently dissuasive and proportionate”.
Fines can range between 30,000 to 5,00,000 Euros in Italy, depending on the level of non-compliance in shareholder identification or transmission of information.
Employees staying on top of this information will help ensure that everyone in your organisation is aligned, extra cautious and capable of meeting regulatory demands.
Maintain processes around consistent investor engagement
SRD II rights to shareholder identification are not limited to the proxy season. With disclosure request volumes growing year-on-year across EU markets, issuers are increasingly using their identification rights as an ongoing governance tool.
For issuers, this framework exists to facilitate ongoing shareholder engagement, not just event-driven communication.
Intermediaries that build response processes only around annual reporting cycles will consistently fail intraday deadlines when requests arrive outside those windows.
Related Read: For a broader view of shareholder engagement trends, see our piece on the topic.
Learn More About SRD & Other Regulations
As SRD II continues to shape the corporate governance landscape across Europe and the UK, the firms best positioned are those that address compliance at the infrastructure level, not through manual workarounds performed against the clock.
By staying informed, proactive and equipped with the latest technology, you can ensure that your company is prepared for the future of shareholder rights and corporate action notices.
Explore our SRD II solutions or contact us to learn more about the SRD II directives, managing corporate action notices and staying ahead of other regulatory requirements.